A genuine look at the last 90 days of Band of Boys + The Girl Club paid media. What's working, what's costing you money, and how we'd protect the AW26 sell-through window without rebuilding the bits that are already producing.
Across the last 90 days your accounts produced $42,300 in Google revenue from $8,500 in spend, plus 366 Meta purchases at $23 each. That's a stronger position than the "sales feel slow" story suggests, especially given the messy handover when you bought the business.
Here's what we found. There's about $1,500 of recoverable spend sitting in your account, your tracking is partially misconfigured, and the prospecting that was bringing in new customers in January and February got switched off right before the season you most need it on.
You've been doing the right things. The setup underneath hasn't been keeping up. We don't want to rebuild what you've built. We want to take the handbrake off, plug the leaks, and switch back on what was already working.
"Strategy was wrong. Should have been targeting return customers." We saw it in the numbers too. The Christmas and EOS season went after cold audiences when the gold was already in your customer list. That kind of miss is fixable, and it's the sort of thing we look for first.
Before we change a thing, here's what we'd leave alone. These four are producing real revenue, at healthy returns. You don't need a rebuild here. You need someone to protect what's working and tighten what isn't.
$20,935 in revenue from $4,051 spend. The single biggest driver in your account, doing 198 orders across the audit window. It's genuinely doing the heavy lifting on Google. We'd keep it running and tighten the creative rotation behind it.
✦$7,916 in revenue from $763 spend. Catching people who are already searching for you by name, and converting them cheaply. 71 sales across the audit window. This is the easiest revenue your business will ever earn.
✦$3,995 in revenue from $266 spend on the Low Priority campaign. Genuinely outstanding numbers. Likely a tighter, more focused product set. Worth understanding what's making this one sing and applying it elsewhere.
✦248 purchases at $19 each, and the High Intent 30-60D ad set is doing most of the lifting. The product catalogue ads behind it are returning $6.55 for every $1 spent. This is the cornerstone of your Meta account.
✦| Campaign | Type | Spend | Orders | Revenue | ROAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMax: Non-Brand | Performance Max | $4,051.52 | 198 | $20,934.61 | 5.17x |
| Search — Generic NZ | Search | $2,455.51 | 57 | $5,687.65 | 2.32x |
| Search — Brand NZ | Search | $762.63 | 71 | $7,916.33 | 10.38x |
| PMAX — Brand | Performance Max | $538.09 | 19 | $1,493.21 | 2.78x |
| Clever Social Shopping (Low) | Shopping | $265.80 | 41 | $3,994.51 | 15.03x |
| PILOT — The Girl Club Search NZ | Search (Paused) | $221.94 | 0 | $0.00 | — |
| Clever Social Shopping (High) | Shopping | $213.79 | 12 | $1,364.40 | 6.38x |
| PILOT — Shopping High Priority BOB | Shopping | $41.68 | 5 | $907.60 | 21.78x |
These are the specific spots where budget is going out without coming back. None are catastrophic. None require a rebuild. They're the kind of small leaks that quietly compound every month they're left alone.
Of $1,478 spent on this campaign, $1,131 went to searches that produced no sales at all. Things like "boys pjs" ($82), "boys clothes" ($43), "kids pyjamas" ($39). These are people browsing, not buying. The campaign needs the search terms cleaned up.
"Add to Basket" and "Begin Checkout" are both flagged as "Misconfigured" in your account. The Purchase event is firing properly, which means your revenue numbers are accurate. But because the cart and checkout signals aren't working, Google can't use them to find more buyers like the ones you're already converting.
PMAX Brand is sitting at 2.78x return, while Search Brand is doing 10.38x on the same kind of traffic. The two campaigns are competing for the same audience and one is winning hands down. Likely causes: not enough budget behind PMax for it to settle, or the creative needs a refresh.
It's paused now, but $222 was spent producing zero sales before it got switched off. Only 177 impressions across that whole spend, meaning the campaign never had enough data to find its feet. Money spent without a clean test.
Mixed picture. Working well: "minti" searches produced $1,199 revenue on $170 spend. Burning money: "kmart" $29 with no sales, "cheeky chickadee" $19 with no sales. The strategy needs cleaning up. Not turning off, just being more deliberate about which competitor names you bid against.
This is the most important finding in the whole audit. Not a leak. A missed opportunity. And it sits right next to the cashflow pressure you talked us through in our meeting.
Between 21 January and 17 February, this campaign brought in 96 sales on $3,154 spend. The Other NZ Cities ad set hit 9.30x return on the dynamic creative. Your Catalogue Prospecting campaign, also paused, was running at a similar 3.93x.
This was your new-customer engine, and it was running.
Right now your only sales-driving Meta activity is retargeting people who already know the brand. You can't move a full winter range with that alone. There aren't enough returning customers to absorb a whole season's stock.
The reason sales feel slow isn't that Meta's not working. It's that the bit that brings new customers in got switched off, right before the season you most need it on.
Your AW26 Launch ran from 28 March to 1 April with $250 in spend, set up to drive reach rather than purchases. It ended up in front of 121,000 people, but the campaign was never trying to make sales. So it didn't.
Why this matters: AW26 is your most important seasonal launch of the year. Putting that budget behind a "let's get seen" campaign, when you needed direct sales, meant the launch couldn't deliver against the pressure you've described to us.
The good news is, this is a structural fix, not a creative one. Same budget, set up properly, with an audience that's been warmed up first, would give you a completely different outcome.
If you brought us in tomorrow, here's exactly what week one through week four looks like. The highest-impact moves first. No rebuild for the sake of it.
Fix the cart and checkout tracking. Clean up the search terms eating budget on Search Generic NZ. Add a brand exclusion to PMax so it stops competing with your cheaper Brand campaign. None of this changes strategy. It just closes the holes.
Relaunch new-customer campaigns on Meta, using what we learned from Aro Sales Prospecting (which was working). Build audiences from your existing purchasers and people who behave like them. AW26 hero products lead the creative. We do this in a focused way, not spreading budget across too many ad sets, which is what left the previous setup stuck.
Rebuild Search Generic NZ around the 13 terms that are actually producing sales. Either get PMAX Brand performing or fold its budget into Search Brand. Confirm GA4 and Google Ads are talking to each other properly so every dollar gets credited where it should.
PMax Non-Brand and Clever Social Shopping both have room to grow. Once everything has settled and the new prospecting is producing, we lift budget on the top performers by 20%, hold for 7 days, see what happens, then scale again. Methodical, not guesswork.
Weekly optimisation pass, monthly report showing what produced, what didn't, and what we did about it. ROAS, revenue, the lot, but in plain English, not a wall of metrics you have to decode.
You're currently running approximately $190/day combined. That's right at the agency-standard minimum viable level. Here's where we'd take it for the AW26 push.
A measured 25–45% lift from where you are now. The extra funds three things: switching prospecting back on for Meta (the missing new-customer piece), giving PMax Non-Brand more room to grow on Google (which is already producing), and making sure Search Brand doesn't run out of budget on the days demand spikes.
This isn't "spend more for the sake of spending more." Based on the 5x average return your account is already producing, another $50–90/day translates to roughly $275–500/day in extra revenue if that efficiency holds, which it should, once the leaks are plugged. We review weekly and only scale if the numbers say to.
Both packages cover Meta and Google ads management end to end. Both are month to month. Ad spend stays in your name. Pick the one that fits where you are right now. You can always upgrade. Other services like UGC management, Klaviyo email and organic social are available as add-ons when you're ready.
A reliable hand on the wheel. Campaigns optimised, leaks plugged, performance protected. The package for ongoing maintenance once AW26 is moving.
Built for the AW26 timeline and the Summer 27 launch ahead. Closer attention, more proactive work, faster feedback loop. The package most clients in your situation choose.
Available as monthly add-ons or project-based work. Most clients start with ads management and layer these in once the foundation is firing.
End-to-end customer content pipeline. Capture, rights management, repurpose into ads. From $650/month.
Welcome series, abandoned cart, post-purchase, monthly campaigns. Typically 20–30% of ecom revenue. From $850/month.
Content calendar, post creation, scheduling, community management for Instagram and Facebook. From $1,100/month.
You've already proven your account can produce.
Our job is to plug what's leaking, switch back on what's been turned off, and make sure AW26 doesn't slip away. The earlier we start, the more of the season we have to work with.